Samantha is an attorney in Hausfeld’s San Francisco office, specializing in complex litigation, class actions, and antitrust enforcement. She primarily represents small businesses and consumers in several major class actions, acting as the lead associate on multiple cases. As a result of this work, SuperLawyers has ranked her a “Rising Star” between 2018-2020.
In her practice, Samantha has dealt with issues ranging from complex econometric modeling and expert work to managing relationships with leniency applicants under the Antitrust Criminal Penalty Enhancement and Reform Act (“ACPERA”) to millions of documents produced in discovery. Samantha has argued in Federal Court, briefed numerous motions, and led discovery in multiple complex cases.
Prior to representing clients at Hausfeld, Samantha worked in the federal court, completing a two-year judicial clerkship in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California with the Honorable Magistrate Judge Maria- Elena James. Samantha was also a judicial extern in Northern District Court with both Magistrate Judges Donna Ryu and Maria-Elena James. During this time in the Northern District, Samantha gained exposure and experience in a wide variety of civil and criminal cases and a diversity of legal and case management issues.
Samantha regularly writes on issues impacting the antitrust and class action bar and participates in events within the antitrust and consumer protection legal communities. She also supports and promotes Hausfeld’s climate justice work wherever possible.
Samantha’s current clients include direct purchaser businesses and consumers.
University of California Hastings College of the Law, J.D. 2014
Boston University, B.A. Political Science, 2009
Judicial Law Clerk to the Honorable Maria-Elena James (2014-2016) Judicial Extern to the Honorable Donna Ryu (2014)
Judicial Extern to the Honorable Maria-Elena James (2013)
Editor and the symposium leader, UC Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly
Extern with the United States Federal Trade Commission and San Francisco City Attorney’s Trial Team
Co-Author, "Oligopoly & No Direct Evidence? Good Luck, Says Third Circuit," Lexology, November14, 2017.
Co-Author, "Ninth Circuit Rejects “Administrative Feasibility” Requirement for Class Certification," Lexology, Febuary 23, 2017.
Peekya App Hires Global Law Firm Hausfeld For Antitrust Case Claiming Google Has Monopolized Mobile App Marketplace
Super Lawyers Recognizes 21 Hausfeld Lawyers Spanning Both Coasts and Multiple Practice Areas
Optical Disk Drive Summary Judgment Orders Clarify FTAIA Claims, But Land Blow to Conspiracy Claims
Oligopoly & No Direct Evidence? Good Luck, Says Third Circuit.
Ninth Circuit Rejects “Administrative Feasibility” Requirement for Class Certification
California’s COVID-19 Response Leads the Way on Price-Gouging Protections, Too
Attorneys General and Consumer Advocates Warn Amazon, Others of Price-Gouging
Price-Gouging Concerns Raised During COVID-19 Crisis