Experience
Sarah’s practice focuses on complex litigation predominantly antitrust, financial services, and consumer protection matters. Sarah represents clients in litigation for harm suffered throughout the world, using innovative solutions to provide exceptional advocacy. Her experience spans a wide range of complex litigation, and her efforts have helped clients recover more than $2.3 billion in settlements.
Clients
Sarah’s clients include individual investors, investment funds, multinational corporations, and consumer products manufacturers. She represents a whistleblower in a qui tam action alleging Medicare and Medicaid fraud and consumers effected by fraudulent emissions software. Sarah’s former clients include specialty film exhibitors, a leading software manufacturer in copyright-infringement litigation against the federal government, an industry organization in the first amendment sphere, and a royalty-rights holder in the college athletics space.
American University Washington College of Law, J.D. (summa cum laude, order of the coif), 2014
University of Ottawa, J.D. (cum laude), 2014
McMaster University, BA (Hons., summa cum laude), 2008
District of Columbia
New York
United States Court of Federal Claims
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Vice Chair, Civil Practice and Procedure Committee, American Bar Association Section on Antitrust Law (2020-2022)
Young Lawyer’s Representative, Civil Practice and Procedure Committee, American Bar Association Section on Antitrust Law (2019-2020)
Senior Note and Comment Editor, Administrative Law Review (2013-2014)
Judicial law clerk to the Honorable Victor J. Wolski on the United States Court of Federal Claims. (2014-2015)
Prior to law school, Sarah worked for Canadian Member of Parliament Scott Reid, and in that role served as the Associate Director of the Canadian Parliamentary Coalition for Combating Antisemitism.
"Rising Star: Hausfeld's Sarah LaFreniere," Law360 (October 3, 2019)
Author, "Personal Jurisdiction in Federal Class Actions: Three New Rulings but Little Clarity,” Hausfeld Competition Bulletin, reprinted in Lexology (May 20, 2020)
Co-Author, "The Equitable Future of Intercollegiate Athletics," Competition Policy International's Antitrust Chronicle (April 28, 2020)
Author, “What the Canadian Air Cargo Decision May Mean for Possible U.S. Claimants,” Hausfeld Competition Bulletin, reprinted in Lexology (March 5, 2019)
Author, “Inconsistent Case Law on 28 U.S.C. 1782 Continues to Confuse Litigants and District Courts,” Hausfeld Competition Bulletin, reprinted in Lexology (November 28, 2018)
Co-Author, "The Volkswagen Scandal: Catalyst For Class Action Change?" Law360 (Feb. 27, 2018)
Author, "Two Years After Campbell-Ewald, Defendants Face Uphill Battle “Picking Off” Named Plaintiffs," Hausfeld Competition Bulletin, reprinted in Lexology (Feb. 21, 2018)
Author, "Product hopping by a pharmaceutical company “likely” violated the antitrust laws," Hausfeld Competition Bulletin, reprinted in Lexology(Oct. 13, 2015)
Panelist, "Antitrust Practices Around the World," Hausfeld and Luthra Partners Joint Webinar (June 18, 2020)
Panelist, “The State of Leniency”, GCR Live 4th Annual Cartels, Washington, DC (March 26, 2019)
Panelist, “Why Antitrust”, ABA Section of Antitrust Law, American university Washington College of Law, Washington, DC (October 23, 2018)
Best Lawyers 2021 Recognizes Six Hausfeld Lawyers on Both Coasts
Super Lawyers Recognizes 21 Hausfeld Lawyers Spanning Both Coasts and Multiple Practice Areas
DC Associate Sarah LaFreniere Honored by Law360 as a 2019 ‘Rising Star’
Financial Times Innovative Lawyers Report Names Hausfeld A Top Firm for Dispute Resolution in North America
American Antitrust Institute Recognizes Hausfeld Attorneys Sarah LaFreniere, Brian Ratner, Brent Landau, Melinda Coolidge and Michael Hausfeld for Outstanding Antitrust Achievements
Hausfeld Announces Final Approval of More than $2.3 Billion in FX Settlements
Private Antitrust Enforcement / Damages Claims Globally – 18 June 2020, Virtual
Personal Jurisdiction in Federal Class Actions: Three New Rulings but Little Clarity
What the Canadian Air Cargo Decision May Mean for Possible U.S. Claimants
Inconsistent Case Law on 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Continues to Confuse Litigants and District Courts
Two Years After Campbell-Ewald, Defendants Face Uphill Battle “Picking Off” Named Plaintiffs
Product Hopping by a Pharmaceutical Company “Likely” Violated the Antitrust Laws
Inconsistent Case Law on 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Continues to Confuse Litigants and District Courts